Open Forum (Ask GMs)
-
- CAPT
- Posts: 24356
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:17 am
- Location: Look...up in the sky
- Contact:
Re: Open Forum (Ask GMs)
At this stage you can't gift them, you need to buy more for the other manager
Master Crowfan of the Blessed Spreadsheet
GarageTM Foundation Member
GarageTM Foundation Member
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:03 am
Re: Open Forum (Ask GMs)
Thought so,
Thanks Mate!!

Former U20 Canada Nat Manager -> Season 46-49
Former Canada Nat Assistant -> Season 50 - 56
Canada Nat Manager -> Season 57 - Current
Former Canada Nat Assistant -> Season 50 - 56
Canada Nat Manager -> Season 57 - Current
-
- Posts: 2734
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:35 am
Re: Open Forum (Ask GMs)
Re PC,
i don't track it regularly but it feels like there is more numbers today then there was not long ago, as i said, i don't know for sure but i feel like the number of ranked teams today ( 1644) seems like a good 200 ish higher then last time i looked god knows when
is the school of thought to still wait for 2048 teams to be there before increasing the cup 1 round ?
i will say, i've always been on the side of including every team even if it means a round of bot bashing for most but given we're getting to the point where upwards of 40+% of the active teams could be missing the cup next season, i think its even more worthy of a discussion now
i don't track it regularly but it feels like there is more numbers today then there was not long ago, as i said, i don't know for sure but i feel like the number of ranked teams today ( 1644) seems like a good 200 ish higher then last time i looked god knows when
is the school of thought to still wait for 2048 teams to be there before increasing the cup 1 round ?
i will say, i've always been on the side of including every team even if it means a round of bot bashing for most but given we're getting to the point where upwards of 40+% of the active teams could be missing the cup next season, i think its even more worthy of a discussion now
Major Titles(Main)
RSA SOD Div 1.1 Seasons 9 & 38
RSA YOD 1.1 Season 6
Pavilion Cup Season 36
Major Titles (affiliate)
AUS YOD 1.1 Seasons 32, 33 & 34
RSA SOD Div 1.1 Seasons 9 & 38
RSA YOD 1.1 Season 6
Pavilion Cup Season 36
Major Titles (affiliate)
AUS YOD 1.1 Seasons 32, 33 & 34
-
- Posts: 22780
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:58 am
Re: Open Forum (Ask GMs)
I've said the same for quite while now, IMHO all managed teams need to be included with the bots making up the rest.leaguegod wrote: ↑Fri Apr 17, 2020 11:00 pmRe PC,
i don't track it regularly but it feels like there is more numbers today then there was not long ago, as i said, i don't know for sure but i feel like the number of ranked teams today ( 1644) seems like a good 200 ish higher then last time i looked god knows when
is the school of thought to still wait for 2048 teams to be there before increasing the cup 1 round ?
i will say, i've always been on the side of including every team even if it means a round of bot bashing for most but given we're getting to the point where upwards of 40+% of the active teams could be missing the cup next season, i think its even more worthy of a discussion now
Then have 512 seeds and away we go, just like the cup used to be. Been told there are issues with this but to me all the upsides easily out way whatever the supposed issues are..
-
- Posts: 2734
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:35 am
Re: Open Forum (Ask GMs)
agree completely, have always had the same train of thought toowolfberries wrote: ↑Fri Apr 17, 2020 11:08 pmI've said the same for quite while now, IMHO all managed teams need to be included with the bots making up the rest.leaguegod wrote: ↑Fri Apr 17, 2020 11:00 pmRe PC,
i don't track it regularly but it feels like there is more numbers today then there was not long ago, as i said, i don't know for sure but i feel like the number of ranked teams today ( 1644) seems like a good 200 ish higher then last time i looked god knows when
is the school of thought to still wait for 2048 teams to be there before increasing the cup 1 round ?
i will say, i've always been on the side of including every team even if it means a round of bot bashing for most but given we're getting to the point where upwards of 40+% of the active teams could be missing the cup next season, i think its even more worthy of a discussion now
Then have 512 seeds and away we go, just like the cup used to be. Been told there are issues with this but to me all the upsides easily out way whatever the supposed issues are..
Major Titles(Main)
RSA SOD Div 1.1 Seasons 9 & 38
RSA YOD 1.1 Season 6
Pavilion Cup Season 36
Major Titles (affiliate)
AUS YOD 1.1 Seasons 32, 33 & 34
RSA SOD Div 1.1 Seasons 9 & 38
RSA YOD 1.1 Season 6
Pavilion Cup Season 36
Major Titles (affiliate)
AUS YOD 1.1 Seasons 32, 33 & 34
-
- CAPT
- Posts: 24356
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:17 am
- Location: Look...up in the sky
- Contact:
Re: Open Forum (Ask GMs)
We are looking at ways to inc all teams but I am fairly sure it won't be by filling it with bots
As far as I am concerned a prestigious tournament should never include bots
As far as I am concerned a prestigious tournament should never include bots
Master Crowfan of the Blessed Spreadsheet
GarageTM Foundation Member
GarageTM Foundation Member
-
- Posts: 22780
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:58 am
Re: Open Forum (Ask GMs)
As long as you aren't thinking of some teams getting byes in the first round or so then 
-
- CAPT
- Posts: 24356
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:17 am
- Location: Look...up in the sky
- Contact:
Re: Open Forum (Ask GMs)
Ah so you want the extra round just for more money, not the good of the game 

Master Crowfan of the Blessed Spreadsheet
GarageTM Foundation Member
GarageTM Foundation Member
-
- Posts: 2734
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:35 am
Re: Open Forum (Ask GMs)
if its not including bots, it would have to be first round byes, wouldn't it ? what other way is there ?wolfberries wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:48 amAs long as you aren't thinking of some teams getting byes in the first round or so then![]()
something like if 1644 teams
then 1240 teams would play Rd 1 and then top ranked 404 would get a bye
like you, i'd personally prefer to fill it with bots but understand why the team wouldn't and do think first round byes are a good compromise to get everyone in
Major Titles(Main)
RSA SOD Div 1.1 Seasons 9 & 38
RSA YOD 1.1 Season 6
Pavilion Cup Season 36
Major Titles (affiliate)
AUS YOD 1.1 Seasons 32, 33 & 34
RSA SOD Div 1.1 Seasons 9 & 38
RSA YOD 1.1 Season 6
Pavilion Cup Season 36
Major Titles (affiliate)
AUS YOD 1.1 Seasons 32, 33 & 34
-
- Posts: 22780
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:58 am
Re: Open Forum (Ask GMs)
Both, to me my option makes sense as everyone gets a game and it worked perfectly before with the seeded teams getting easy games to start with. Yet you're the boss so if you choose another way then fine but still doesn't mean this isn't a sensible option that works.GM-crowfan65 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:56 amAh so you want the extra round just for more money, not the good of the game![]()
I suppose I am being a bit selfish as I really just want to stop being penalised for being a homegrown side, as a team who has been ranked outside of 256 but under 512 I've basically just met teams far too highly rated for a first round IMHO, we are talking anything from about 205k to 244k! I think out of the 8 games in the last 4 seasons one was an easy win as it should be then one was around 185k then the rest as above, even then I marched into big rated teams in the second round when I first met those lower rated teams.
Maybe it's just me but I don't think teams ranked about 300 should be meeting teams ranked in the 256 and rating 230k in round one but eh that's just me.
Last edited by wolfberries on Sat Apr 18, 2020 10:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 22780
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:58 am
Re: Open Forum (Ask GMs)
Therefore teams like mine would be getting penalised as both my sides are homegrown and rank within the first 404, yet we really depend on games to get experience. Yes I choose the homegrown way which means I have a squad evenly spaced out between 21 and 31.leaguegod wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:00 amif its not including bots, it would have to be first round byes, wouldn't it ? what other way is there ?wolfberries wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:48 amAs long as you aren't thinking of some teams getting byes in the first round or so then![]()
something like if 1644 teams
then 1240 teams would play Rd 1 and then top ranked 404 would get a bye
like you, i'd personally prefer to fill it with bots but understand why the team wouldn't and do think first round byes are a good compromise to get everyone in
Just tired of currently meeting teams rating 230 in the first round and now the next suggestion is I miss out on the first round to no doubt meet highly rated teams in round two.
-
- CAPT
- Posts: 24356
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:17 am
- Location: Look...up in the sky
- Contact:
Re: Open Forum (Ask GMs)
Being in the top 512, you shouldn't have played those sides and we will correct it
If we go down the route of top X seeds betting a bye, you don't lose a game that you currently play you just don't get the extra one
Also teams will be seeded completely and top seed will play bottom etc
If we go down the route of top X seeds betting a bye, you don't lose a game that you currently play you just don't get the extra one
Also teams will be seeded completely and top seed will play bottom etc
Master Crowfan of the Blessed Spreadsheet
GarageTM Foundation Member
GarageTM Foundation Member